肖训军;张元庆;孟庆翔;

• 1:中国农业大学动物科技学院
• 2:中国农业大学动物科技学院
• 3:中国农业大学动物科技学院 北京100094
• 4:北京100094

摘要(Abstract)：

本文旨在比较研究毛茛科植物提取物、莫能霉素和苹果酸对小麦粉的肉牛瘤胃体外发酵的影响效果。试验采用体外产气量法进行。瘤胃液供体动物为3头装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的本地黄牛,发酵底物为小麦粉。试验设3个处理组:毛茛科植物提取物组(200mg/L)、莫能霉素组(5mg/L)和苹果酸组(10mmol/L),对照组不添加调控剂。结果表明,各处理组之间小麦粉DM降解率差异不显著(P=0.06),活体外24h产气量、理论最大产气量、产气速率和产气延滞期差异极显著(P<0.01)。植物提取物处理组能明显提高发酵液pH,而莫能霉素和苹果酸处理组导致发酵液pH下降(P<0.05),不同处理组间各发酵时间点的发酵液中乳酸含量无显著差异(P>0.05)且均较低。各处理组之间的总挥发性脂肪酸产量无显著性差异(P>0.05),但各种挥发性脂肪酸的摩尔百分比例差异显著(P<0.05)。本试验中3个处理组均能明显改变小麦粉的体外发酵。与莫能霉素相比,提取物能明显提高小麦粉体外发酵液pH,增加总挥发性脂肪酸产量,改变各种挥发性脂肪酸的摩尔百分比例,而苹果酸处理对小麦粉体外发酵的调控效果不理想。

关键词(KeyWords)： 植物提取物;莫能霉素;苹果酸;乳酸中毒;肉牛

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30070562)

作者(Author): 肖训军;张元庆;孟庆翔;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Russell J B,Strobel HJ.Effects of ionophores on ruminal fer mentation.Applied Environment Micro-biology,1989,55:1-5.
• [2]Dinius S M,Si moson M E,Marsh P B.Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion andthe rumi-nal ecosystemof steers.Journal of Ani mal Science,1976,42:229-234.
• [3]Van Nevel C J,Demeyer DI.Effects of monensin on rumen metabolis min vitro.Applied Environment Microbiology,1977,34:251-256.
• [4]Dennis S M,Nagaraja T G,Bartley E E.Effects oflasalocid or monensin on lactate-producing or-using rumen bacteria.Journal of Ani mal Science,1981,52:418-426.
• [5]Bergen W G,Bates D B.Ionophores:Their effect on production efficiency and mode of action.Jour-nal of Ani mal Science,1984,58:1465-1471.
• [6]Russell J B.A proposed mechanis mof monensin ac-tion in inhibiting ruminal bacterial growth:effects on ion flux and proton motive force.Journal of An-i mal Science,1987,64:1519-1525.
• [7]Nisbet DJ,Martin S A.Effect of a Saccharomyces erevisiae culture onlactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium.Journal of Ani mal Science,1991,69:4628-4634.
• [8]Nisbet DJ,Martin S A.Factors affecting L-lactate utilization by Selenmonas ruminantium.Journal of Ani mal Science,1994,72:1355-1361.
• [9]Martin S A,Streeter M N.Effect of malate on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganis m fer mentation.Journal of Ani mal Science,1995,73:2141-2145.
• [10]Callaway T R,Martin S A.Effects of organic acids and monensin treat ment on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganis mfer mentation fer mentation of crack-en corn.Journal of Ani mal Science,1996,74:1982-1989.
• [11]Menke K H,Steingass H.Esti mation of the ener-getic feed value obtained fromchemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid.Ani mal Research Development,1979,28:7-55.
• [12]Broderick G A,Kang J H.Automated si multaneous deter mination of ammonia and amino acids in rumi-nal fluids and in vitro media.Journal of Dairy Sci-ence,1980,63:64-75.
• [13]Barker S B,Summerson W H.The colori metric de-ter mination of lactic acid in biological material.Journal of Biological Chemistry,1941,138:535-554.
• [14]SAS Institute.User’s guide:statistics,version6e-ditions.SAS Institute.Inc.,Cary,N.C.1996.
• [15]Domescik E D,Martin S A.Effects if laidlomcin propionate and monensin onthein vitro ruminal mi-croorganis m fer mentation.Journal of Ani mal Sci-ence,1999,77:2305-2312.
• [16]Martin S A.Manipulation of ruminal fer mentation with organic acids:A review.Journal of Ani mal Science,1998,76:3123-3132.
• [17]Slyter L L.Influence of acidosis on rumen function.Journal of Ani mal Science,1976,43:910-929.
• [18]Stock R,Britton R A.Acidosis in feedlot cattle.Scientific update on Ruminsin/Tylan for the profes-sional feedlot consultant.Elanco Ani mal Health,Indiannapolis,IN.1993.
• [19]Martin S A,Streeter M N,Nisbet D J,Hill G M.Effects of DL-malate on ruminal metabolis m and perfor mance of cattle fed a high concentrate diet.Journal of Ani mal Science,1999,77:1008-1015.